What's yours?
I agree, however. My guess is they want us to spend lots of time reading rules carefully ( over + o er ) to get everything exactly right. Advertisement product might stick in our memory. The giveaway is just an enticement to get potential customers. Gotta believe some marketing people have never entered a sweepstakes/drawing/giveaway ...My personal opinion but I think there should be a legal requirement for sweepstakes who charge for entries to have a completely free entry method and not by postal mail. Postal mail as we all know is far from free.I've seen some other sweeps sponsors who have a paid method also state in the their rules "send an email to ...". for a free entry. I think most people would rather just send a quick email than send something via postal mail. Hopefully that will change in the future.
I actually thought about my reply again later. No, the government does not require postal mail for free entry, but it does strictly mandate that a free alternative method of entry (amoe sweepstakes) must exist to prevent a sweepstakes from being classified as an illegal lottery. While companies can legally offer free entry via online forms, email, or QR codes, many choose a mail-in option voluntarily to deter automated bot fraud, ensure "equal dignity" in effort between paid and free entrants, and create a minor financial friction (the cost of a stamp) that discourages individuals from spamming the system.I agree, however. My guess is they want us to spend lots of time reading rules carefully ( over + o er ) to get everything exactly right. Advertisement product might stick in our memory. The giveaway is just an enticement to get potential customers. Gotta believe some marketing people have never entered a sweepstakes/drawing/giveaway ...